During the three-year period of the Move2Learn project, researcher-practitioner teams across six museum sites are collaboratively investigating the links between movement and learning outcomes at selected science exhibits designed for young learners. Research activities will involve iteration and refinement of new instruments and protocols, through analysis of observed and automated capture of interaction data, and synthesis and interpretation of data.
Overview of what’s happening at each research site.
Move2Learn is developing novel methodologies for capturing children’s whole-body exhibit interaction and learning, where we focus on children when they are engaging alone, with peers, and with their parents. Our methods involve both in-depth video analysis and real-time observation tools for capturing children’s exhibit interaction and pre and post interaction interviews. We focus on how children’s experiences support the way they think and communicate science ideas, as well as their emotional engagement with these experiences. Move2learn is also developing culturally sensitive survey tools that let us examine the factors influencing the way children and their parents interact at exhibits.
Our design-based research methodology addresses these questions:
- In what ways can embodied interaction represent as well as communicate scientific thinking?
- How can we improve embodied interaction to support children’s science thinking?
- How does embodied interaction relate to children’s enjoyment of exhibits?
- How do families influence children’s embodied interaction?
- What, if any, socio-cultural differences exist between children and/or their families with regard to embodied interaction behaviors and their perceived value of early science learning.
New to embodied learning? Start here for a quick dive!
Clough, S. and Hilverman, C. (2018). Hand Gestures and How They Help Children Learn. Published on Frontiers for Young Minds, June 26, 2018. https://kids.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/frym.2018.00029
Dewar, G. (2019). The science of gestures: We learn faster when we talk with our hands. Published on Parenting Science: https://www.parentingscience.com/gestures.html
Manches, A. (2017).Three Ways Hand Gestures Can Influence How We Learn. https://vimeo.com/160639180
McNerney, S. (2011). A Brief Guide to Embodied Cognition: Why You Are Not Your Brain. Scientific American, Guest Blog, Nov 4, 2011. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/a-brief-guide-to-embodied-cognition-why-you-are-not-your-brain/#
Schwartz, K. (2015). Why Kids Need to Move, Touch and Experience to Learn. MindShift KQED News, March 26, 2015. https://www.kqed.org/mindshift/39684/why-kids-need-to-move-touch-and-experience-to-learn
Embodied Learning/Embodied Cognition
Abrahamson, D., & Lindgren, R. (2014). Embodiment and embodied design. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (2nd edition). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://edrl.berkeley.edu/publications/abrahamson-d-lindgren-r-2014-embodiment-and-embodied-design/
Abramova, E., Slors, M. (2018). Mechanistic explanation for enactive sociality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 18,401–424 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-018-9577-8
Amin, T. et al (2015). Conceptual Metaphor and Embodied Cognition in Science Learning: Introduction to special issue. International Journal of Science Education, 37:5-6, 745-758. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1025245
Claxton, G. (2015). Intelligence in the Flesh: Why Your Mind Needs Your Body Much More Than It Thinks. Yale University Press, Aug 25, 2015.
Dackermann, T., Fischer, U., Nuerk, H. et al (2017). Applying embodied cognition: from useful interventions and their theoretical underpinnings to practical applications. ZDM Mathematics Education 49, 545–557. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0850-z
Dargue, N., Sweller, N. (2019). Learning Stories Through Gesture: Gesture’s Effects on Child and Adult Narrative Comprehension. Educational Psychology Review. Published online 26 August 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09505-0
Ghazali-Mohammed, Z. (2017). Literature Review: An embodied perspective of conceptual understanding of science in the early years. Please contact Move2Learn to receive a copy.
Ghazali-Mohammed, Z., Manches, A. & Lindgren, R. (2020, Apr 17 – 21) Video Analysis to Real-Time Observation of Adult-Child Interaction: The Challenge of Translation [Poster Session]. AERA Annual Meeting San Francisco, CA http://tinyurl.com/sj3jye2 (Conference Canceled)
Glenberg, A. M., Witt, J. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2013). From the Revolution to Embodiment: 25 Years of Cognitive Psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 573–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613498098
Goldin-Meadow, S. et al (2009). Gesturing Gives Children New Ideas About Math. Psychological Science, Vol 30, No. 3, 267-272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02297.x
Hostetter, A.B., Alibali, M.W. (2019). Gesture as simulated action: Revisiting the framework. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 26, 721–752. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1548-0
Kita, S. et al (2017). How Do Gestures Influence Thinking and Speaking? The Gesture-for-Conceptualization Hypothesis. Psychological Review: 2017, Vol 124, No. 3, 245-266. https://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Frev0000059
Kontra, C., et al (2015). Physical Experience Enhances Science Learning. Psychological Sciences OnlineFirst, published on April 24, 2015, vol 26, Issue 6, 2015. http://10.1177/0956797615569355
Levy, S. (2013). Young children’s learning of water physics by constructing working systems. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23, 537–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-012-9202-z
Lindgren, R., & Johnson-Glenberg, M. (2013). Emboldened by Embodiment: Six Precepts for Research on Embodied Learning and Mixed Reality. Educational Researcher, 42(8), 445–452. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X13511661
Lindgren, R. W., & Price, S. (2018). Embodiment and technology enhanced learning environments: Cultivating a new community of design research. Chapter 12 in Conversations on Embodiment Across Higher Education: Teaching, Practice and Research (pp. 173-189). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315266664
Manches, A., et al (2020). From Design to Difference: Increasing impact of IDC Research. IDC 2020 Extended Abstracts, June 21–24, 2020, London, UK. Published in Journal for Education in Museums, June 2020.
McNeill, D. (1994). Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought. Bibliovault OAI Repository, the University of Chicago Press. Vol 27 DO 10.2307/1576015. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/37688404_Hand_and_Mind_What_Gestures_Reveal_About_Thought
McNeill, D. (2005). Gesture: A Psycholinguistic Approach. Available at McNeill Lab Center for Gesture and Speech Research, University of Chicago. http://mcneilllab.uchicago.edu/pdfs/gesture.a_psycholinguistic_approach.cambridge.encyclop.pdf
Niebert, K. et al (2012). Understanding needs embodiment: A theory‐guided reanalysis of the role of metaphors and analogies in understanding science. Science Education, Vol 96, Issue 5, 849-877.
Novack, M.A., Goldin-Meadow, S. (2017). Gesture as representational action: A paper about function. Psychonomic Bulletin Review 24, 652–665. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1145-z
(2012) On the Science of Embodied Cognition in the 2010s: Research Questions, Appropriate Reductionism, and Testable Explanations, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 21:2, 324-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.614325
Parrill, F. & Sweetser, E. (2004). What We Mean by Meaning: Conceptual Integration in Gesture Analysis and Transcription. Gesture. 4. 197-219. 10.1075/gest.4.2.05par. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233543972_What_We_Mean_by_Meaning_Conceptual_Integration_in_Gesture_Analysis_and_Transcription
Price, S., Roussos, G. & Sheridan, J. (2009). Technology and embodiment: relationships and implications for knowledge, creativity and communication. Beyond Current Horizons, London Knowledge Lab. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238600360_Technology_and_embodiment_relationships_and_implications_for_knowledge_creativity_and_communication
Wakefield, E. et al (2018). Gesture for generalization: gesture facilitates flexible learning of words for actions on objects. Developmental Science, Volume 21, Issue 5. http://indiana.edu/~canlab/assets/wakefield_et_al-2018-developmental_science.pdf
Zubrowski, B. (2009) Exploration and Meaning Making in the Learning of Science, in Innovations in Science Education and Technology, 18, DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-2496-1_5, © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9789048124954
Collins, A., et al (2004). Design Research: Theoretical and Methodological Issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13:1, 15-42. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_2
Kelly, A. (2004). Design Research in Education: Yes, but is it Methodological? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13:1, 115-128, http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1301_6
Penuel, W. et al (2011). Organizing Research and Development at the Intersection of Learning, Implementation, and Design. Educational Researcher, 40(7), 331–337. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X11421826
Sandoval, W. (2013). Educational design research in the 21st century. Chapter 33. Routledge. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259694116_Educational_design_research_in_the_21st_century
(2014) Conjecture Mapping: An Approach to Systematic Educational Design Research, Journal of the Learning Sciences, 23:1, 18-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2013.778204
Science/Children’s Museum Environments for Learning
Andanen, E., et al (2017) Researching the Value of Educator Actions for Learning (REVEAL): A Video-Based Reflection Guide for Engaging with Families at Interactive Exhibits https://external-wiki.terc.edu/display/Reveal/Educator+Resources
Anderson, D. et al (published online 2010). Children’s Museum Experiences: Identifying Powerful Mediators of Learning. The Museum Journal, Vol 45, Issue 3, July 2002, 213-231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2151-6952.2002.tb00057.x
Andre, L., Durksen, T. & Volman, M.L. (2017) Museums as avenues of learning for children: a decade of research. Learning Environ Res 20, 47–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9222-9
Barriault, C. and Pearson, D. (2010). Assessing Exhibits for Learning in Science Centers: A Practical Tool. Visitor Studies. 13. 90-106. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233338902_Assessing_Exhibits_for_Learning_in_Science_Centers_A_Practical_Tool
(2018) Meeting the audience challenge in the ‘Age of Participation’, Museum Management and Curatorship, 33:4, 302-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/09647775.2018.1469097
Bron, S. et al (2018). ecsite Online Newsletter SPOKES Vol #38. Science centres as research facilities, exhibitions as explorations. https://www.ecsite.eu/activities-and-services/news-and-publications/digital-spokes/issue-38-0#section=section-indepth&href=/feature/depth/science-centres-research-facilities-exhibitions-explorations
Callanan, M. (2012). Conducting Cognitive Developmental Research in Museums: Theoretical Issues and Practical Considerations. Journal of Cognition and Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/15248372.2012.666730
Dancu, T.,Gutwill, J. & Sindorf, L. (2015). Comparing the Visitor Experience at Immersive and Tabletop Exhibits. Curator: The Museum Journal. 58. 401-422. 10.1111/cura.12137. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/cura.12137
Dierking, L. and Falk, J. (1994). Family Behavior and Learning in Informal Science Settings: A Review of the Research. Science Education 78(1):57-72. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730780104
Hobson, M. and Hauan, N. (2016) Finding Common Ground between Designers and Museum Practitioners. ecsite Online Newsletter Spoke, Vol #21. https://www.ecsite.eu/activities-and-services/news-and-publications/digital-spokes/issue-21#section=section-lookout&href=/feature/lookout/finding-common-ground-between-designers-and-museum-practitioners
Kidd, J. and Nieto McAvoy, E. (2019). Immersive Experiences in Museums, Galleries and Heritage Sites: A review of research findings and issues. Discussion Paper 2, School of Journalism, Media and Culture, Cardiff University. https://pec.ac.uk/discussion-papers/immersive-experiences-in-museums-galleries-and-heritage-sites-a-review-of-research-findings-and-issues
Leister, W. et al (2016). Assessing Visitor Engagement in Science Centres and Museums. International Journal on Advances in Life Sciences, vol 8, 1 & 2. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305000820_Assessing_Visitor_Engagement_in_Science_Centres_and_Museums
National Research Council. 2009. Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12190. https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12190/learning-science-in-informal-environments-people-places-and-pursuits
Piscitella, B. and Anderson, D. (2001). Young Children’s Perspectives of Museum Settings and Experiences. Museum Management and Curatorship, September 2001. DOI: 10.1016/S0260-4779(01)00018-8
Povis, K. and Crowley, K. (2015). Family Learning in Object-Based Museums: The Role of Joint Attention. Visitor Studies, 18:2, 168-182. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283780236_Family_Learning_in_Object-Based_Museums_The_Role_of_Joint_Attention
Sobel, D. and Jipson, J, editors (2016). Cognitive Development in Museum Settings: Relating Research and Practice. Routledge, New York, NY. https://www.routledge.com/Cognitive-Development-in-Museum-Settings-Relating-Research-and-Practice/Sobel-Jipson/p/book/9781848724891
Swartz, M. and Crowley, K. (2004). Parent Beliefs about Teaching and Learning in a Children’s Museum, Visitor Studies Today, Summer 2004, Volume VII, IssueII http://upclose.pitt.edu/articles/2004%20Swartz%20&%20Crowley%20Visitor%20Studies.pdf
Van Schijndel, T. et al (2010). The Exploratory Behavior Scale: Assessing Young Visitors’Hands-On Behavior in Science Museums. Science Education, Vol 94, Issue 5, September 2010, 794-809. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/sce.20394
Deans for Impact (2019). The Science of Early Learning. Austin, TX: Deans for Impact. https://deansforimpact.org/resources/the-science-of-early-learning/
Fleer. M. and Ridgway, A. (eds.), Visual Methodologies and Digital Tools for Researching with Young Children, International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development 10. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-01469-2_1
Gopnik, A. (2012). Scientific Thinking in Young Children: Theoretical Advances, Empirical Research, and Policy Implications. Science 337, 1623. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/337/6102/1623.abstract
Howard-Jones, P. (2018). Evolution of the Learning Brain: Or How You Got To Be So Smart. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315150857
Laevers, F. (2005). Deep-level-learning and the Experiential Approach in Early Childhood and Primary Education, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Research Centre for Early Childhood and Primary Education.
Malvilidi, M. et al (2018). Immediate and delayed effects of integrating physical activity into preschool children’s learning of numeracy skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 166 (2018) 502-519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.09.009
McClure, E. R. (2017). STEM starts early: Grounding science, technology, engineering, and math education in early childhood. New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop. A full-text PDF of this report is available as a free download from: http://www.joanganzcooneycenter.org
Shwe Hadani, H, Lead Researcher and Co-author, Rood, E., Editor and Co-author (2018). The Roots of STEM Success: Changing Early Learning Experiences to Build Lifelong Thinking Skills, Center for Childhood Creativity. http://www.informalscience.org/news-views/roots-stem-success
Silander, M., et al (2018) What Parents Talk About When They Talk About Learning: A National Survey About Young Children and Science. New York, NY, & Menlo Park, CA: Education Development Center, Inc., & SRI International. https://www.edc.org/sites/default/files/uploads/EDC_SRI_What_Parents_Talk_About.pdf
Sinatra, G., Heddy, B. and Lombardi, D. (2015) The Challenges of Defining and Measuring Student Engagement in Science. Educational Psychologist, 50:1, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.1002924
Weinstein, Y., Sumeracki, M. and Caviglioli, O. (2018). Understanding How We Learn: A Visual Guide. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Understanding-How-We-Learn-A-Visual-Guide-1st-Edition/Weinstein-Sumeracki-Caviglioli/p/book/9781138561724
Lakoff, G. (2015). How Brains Think: The Embodiment Hypothesis. Keynote address recorded March 14, 2015 at the inaugural International Convention of Psychological Science in Amsterdam https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WuUnMCq-ARQ
Lakoff, G. (2013). Presentation by Cognitive Science and Linguistics Professor at UC Berkeley: Cascade Theory: Embodied Cognition and Language from a Neural Perspective at the Central European University on October 22, 2013. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XWYaoAoijdQ
Penuel, W., et al. (2016). Design-Based Research Implementation. http://learndbir.org/
On the Web
Bailenson, J. (2017). Virtual reality offers a captivating way to learn—in the classroom and beyond. Interview on School’s In radio program, Stanford University Graduate School of Education, April 16, 2017. https://ed.stanford.edu/news/virtual-reality-offers-captivating-way-learn-classroom-and-beyond
Beaumont, L. (2015). The Adult Child Interaction Inventory: A tool for exhibit development and evaluation. Evergreene Research and Evaluation. http://evergreeneresearch.com/index#/acii
Blanquet, E., Stylinaidou, F. and du Preez, H, guest editors (2018). Special Issue: STEM & Early Childhood Education, European Journal of STEM Education: 2018, Volume 3, Issue 3. http://www.lectitopublishing.nl/european-journal-of-stem-education/volume-3/issue-3
Goldhill, O. (2019). The replication crisis is killing psychologists’ theory of how the body influences the mind. Quartz, January 16, 2019. https://qz.com/1525854/
Gutwill, J. and Dancstep, T (2019). How Do Children Engage with STEM Museum Exhibits? Results from a Large Observational Study. Posted online at https://www.informalscience.org/news-views/how-do-children-engage-stem-museum-exhibits-results-large-observational-study
Hadani, H., ed. (2017). Attention, please!: Optimizing children’s learning in museums. Creativity Trend Report. Vol 2: Spring 2017, 6-7. http://centerforchildhoodcreativity.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2016/03/CCC-Trend-Report-2-single-page-14.pdf
Hadani, H., and Rood, E., editor (2018). The Roots of STEM Success: Changing Early Learning Experiences to Build Lifelong Thinking Skills. Center for Childhood Creativity. https://centerforchildhoodcreativity.org/roots-stem-success/
Munley, M. (2012). Early Learning in Museums: A Review of Literature. Prepared for the Smithsonian Institution’s Early Learning Collaborative NetworkandSmithsonian Early Enrichment Center (SEEC). Available online at https://www.si.edu/seec/resources
Wallis, C. (2017). How Seeing and Using Gestures Make Ideas More Memorable. The Hechinger Report, Oct 25, 2017 https://www.kqed.org/mindshift/49541/how-seeing-and-using-gestures-make-ideas-more-memorable